在中華文化的大糞坑裡，A蛆對B蛆說，“1936年10月5日，魯迅(1881年-1936年10月19日)在《“立此存照”（三）》一文中說，‘我至今還在希望有人譯出史密斯的《支那人氣質》來，把這本書當成一面鏡子，看了這些，而自省，分析，明白哪幾點說得對，變革，掙扎，自做工夫，卻不求別人的原諒和稱讚，來證明究竟怎樣的是中國人。’，為啥毛澤東只利用‘魯迅’而卻不接受‘Arthur Henderson Smith’？”；B蛆說，“那‘魯迅’ 並不等於‘Arthur Henderson Smith’，那‘魯迅’並不接受‘Arthur Henderson Smith’在《Chinese Characteristies 》書結論裡的‘Christian Civilization’觀點，毛澤東與魯迅都代表‘黑暗與邪惡’，毛澤東與魯迅都代表‘中華虛無文化’，毛澤東與魯迅都代表反‘Christian Civilization’，所以毛澤東才可以利用魯迅殺人，不是嗎？”天空中的飛鳥說，“主耶穌基督說，‘I am the light of the world. He that follows me will by no means walk in darkness, but will possess the light of life.’(John 8:12)與‘YOU will know the truth, and the truth will set YOU free.’(John 8:32)，那些拒絕‘Light’(Matt 24:14; Matt 28:18-20; John 8:12; John 1:4; 1 John 5:1; 1 John 2:8; Exo 19:18)與‘Truth’(John 14:6; John 8:32; John 6:35; Mat 24: 35; Gen 1:28; John 6:35-40; John 6:48–58)者，只能成為‘Satan's Slave’與‘Satan's offspring’(Gen 3:1; Gen 3:15; Mat 23:33; Mat 12:34; Acts 28:3; Rev 12:9; Rev 18:3; Rev 20:2)，不是嗎？”
2011-5-19(Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/)
Ps 1, “Arthur Henderson Smith”( 1845—1932年)在《Chinese Characteristics》(1890版)書裡的結論說: “In order to reform China, the springs of character must be reached, and purified, conscience must be practically enthroned, and no longer imprisoned in its own palace, like the long line of Japanese Mikados. It is a truth well stated by one of the leading exponents of modern philosophy, that “there is no alchemy by which to get golden conduct from leader instincts”. What China needs is righteousness, and in order to attain it, it is absolutely necessary that she have a clear perception, and a deep conviction that there is a “Power that makes for righteousness.” The perception of such a power, gives a meaning to History, other than that of a blind evolution of unknown and unpreventable causes. Marcus Aurelius expressed the feeling of the best part of Paganism, when he said in substance, “things are repeated over and over from eternity,” “whatever happens, or is to happen, has in fact already been. It is only the same show repeated.” But the thought of progress, toward an end divinely contemplated, by agencies of new and transcendent effectiveness, that was common to Christians and “it formed the contrast,” as Neander has said, “between the Christian view of life, and the Pagan notion of a circle aimlessly repeating itself by a blind law of necessity.” “Christianity to-day, to a greater exent than ever before, is the moulding force of civilization…. It has passed in fact, into the thought and life of the world; and all recent enterprize among the nations of Christendom, for physical advance, for legal reform, for just amendment of political conditions, takes impulse and courage from this hope of the future. The age is one “impatient of Isthmuses”. It is equally impatient of mountain barriers, or of the obstacles to human intercourse interposed by winds and waves on the sea, by streams of desert-tracts on the land. And behind every drill which cuts the rock in the mountain tunnel, behind every engine which drives the ship against storm and tempest over the riotous fury of waves, or which propels the loaded train over alkali plains and rocky crests, is this invisible force of the spirit which since the new religion came, has expected a future to be wrought our by it, conformable to it, its ultimate crown of earthly glory.” The manifold needs of China, we find then to be a single imperative need. It will be met permanently, completely, only, by Christian Civilization.” ，這是東亞大陸人121年來一直無法了解的真理。
Ps 2, “Christian Civilization”是“基督文明”，是“Jehovah's commandments and Jesus' gospel文明”，而不是“基督教文明”；“基督教文明”曾犯過許多違反“Jehovah's commandments and Jesus' gospel”(Matt 7:21-23)的罪行。
Ps 3, 魯迅遺書 :
一，不得因爲喪事，收受任何人的一文錢。------但老朋友的，不在此列。
二，趕快收斂，埋掉，拉倒。
三，不要做任何關於紀念的事情。
四，忘記我，管自己生活。------倘不，那就真是糊塗蟲。
五，孩子長大，倘無才能，可尋點小事情過活，萬不可去做空頭文學家或美術家。
六，別人應許給你的事物，不可當真。
七，損着別人的牙眼，卻反對報複，主張寬容的人，萬勿和他接近。
對怨敵，魯迅留了這樣的話“我的怨敵可謂多矣”，“讓他們怨恨去，我也一個都不寬恕”
（摘自1936年9月5日作的散文《死》）
魯迅遺書全盤否定了自己存在與思想的價值，魯迅遺書體現了魯迅反“Christian Civilization”的本質，魯迅遺書體現了魯迅“黑暗”與“邪惡”的本質，魯迅遺書體現了魯迅“心靈骯髒、虛無、絕望與邁向死亡”的本質。
