1/19/2011

Hugo: 阿Q式的存在型態與阿Q式的革命--《讓子彈飛》

在中華文化的大糞坑裡,有兩喪屍蛆(Mark 5:9; Gen 3:15; Rom 6:23; Rom 3:10-20; Rom 1:18-32; Rev 12:9; Mat 12:43; Mark 1:26; Mark 5:9; Luke 4:31-37; Luke 4:41)在看《讓子彈飛》電影, A喪屍蛆對B喪屍蛆說,“這不就是‘劉邦’殺‘項羽’?這不就是‘張阿Q’殺‘黃阿Q’?這不就是‘張獻忠殺人土匪’殺‘黃世仁殺人惡霸’?這不就是‘新的殺人土匪政權’殺‘舊的殺人惡霸政權’?這不就是‘新的殺人土匪政權’取代‘舊的殺人惡霸政權’?這‘新的殺人土匪政權’不就是‘新的黃世仁殺人惡霸政權’?這‘新的殺人土匪政權’不就是新的‘馬拉列車’與‘馬列翻車’政權?這不就是喪屍在鼓吹‘槍杆子裡面出政權’與‘勝者為王’的殺人概念?這不就是喪屍在強調‘殺人是英雄’與‘殺人如同是英雄喝涼水’(中華黑色幽默文化)的邪惡概念?這不就是喪屍群‘永恆回歸黑暗的中華殺人與喪屍蛆文化’嗎?”

B喪屍蛆說,“在‘鵝城’(‘飢餓之城’,2 Kings 6:22-29)裡,喪屍蛆們只能幻想‘康城’(小康社會、和諧社會、北京奧運麻醉劑)是好的,喪屍蛆們只能用‘打麻將’(權謀詭詐、博弈、混淆、瞎攪和)的心態來面對存在的虛無,這不就是阿Q式的存在型態嗎?‘張獻忠土匪’只能用‘謊言’來合理化殺人與搶劫的邪惡行為,這不就是阿Q式的革命嗎?這不就是用‘土匪式的殺人與搶劫活動’來美化‘革命’嗎?這群‘土匪’、‘惡霸’與‘深具奴性的群眾’(包括‘六四群眾’與‘擁護《零八憲章》群眾’)能變成‘Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton’嗎?能建立真正的‘Constitutional Republic’與‘Tripartite Separation of Powers(Separation of executive, legislative, and judicial powers)’文化嗎?”

此時,黑暗處傳來了喪屍蛆(Zombie Maggots)集體合唱的歌聲,“所謂的‘讓子彈飛’就是‘喪屍呼籲要殺人了’,就是‘喪屍要讓人流血了’,就是‘喪屍呼籲新的大一統大屠殺了’,就是‘喪屍在唱血染的風采’,就是‘喪屍在喊:起來!不願做奴隸的人們! 把我們的血肉,築成我們新的長城!’,就是‘喪屍呼籲要建立新的大一統殺人政權了’,就是‘虛無的豬一直在追求被殺與流血的時刻,一直在幻想被殺與流血時會獲得真正存在的高潮’,不是嗎?”歌聲。

烏鴉望著大糞坑裡十幾億正在唱“殺人歌”的喪屍蛆說,“主耶穌基督說,‘I am the light of the world. He that follows me will by no means walk in darkness, but will possess the light of life.’(John 8:12),如果你不肯接受這‘Light’(John 1:4; John 3:16; John 8:12; John 1:4; John 14:6; John 8:32; John 6:35; Is 42:8; Mt 22:36-40; Exo 20:2-17; Deu 5:6-21; Mt 4:10),那麼你如何能認知‘All Human Beings Are Created in the Image of God’(Gen 1:26; Gen 2:7)、‘Spirit of Liberty’、‘Freeman’(1 Cor 2:12; 1 Cor 6:19-20; Exo 8:20; Exo 9:1; John 8:32)、‘Individual dignity, integrity, faith, hope, love, justice, morality, freedom, liberty, creativity, joy, happiness and peace’與‘All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that they are among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’(Gen 1:27; Acts 17:26; Rom 2:6; Rom 2:11; Rom 10:12; Acts 10:34-35; Acts 17:26; Malachi 2:10; 1 Peter 1:17-19; Eph 6:5-9; Gal 2:6; Col 2:23-25; Eze 18:30-32; James 2:1-9)等信念?那麼你如何能了解‘Arthur Henderson Smith’在《Chinese Characteristics》書結論裡所說的‘Truth’呢?”

2011-1-18(Hugo Liberalitas:http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/)

Ps 1, “張獻忠土匪”只能用“謊言”來合理化“殺人與搶劫”的邪惡行為: 例如,以撒銀子的謊言來粉飾土匪殺人的本質;土匪以“已活捉了黃世仁惡霸”的謊言,來鼓動深具奴性的群眾進行攻擊惡霸與搶劫惡霸財產的活動;那些深具奴性與虛無性的群眾只是“勝者為王”概念的擁護者,只是“殺人政權”裡的投機份子,只是“殺人政權”裡的小偷或強盜(They have no sense of individual dignity, faith, love, justice, morality, free will, creativity, liberty, joy);那些“土匪”、“惡霸” 、“土匪與惡霸的爪牙”與“深具奴性與虛無性的群眾”都是踐踏“Individual dignity and life”者,都是“撒旦的奴人與殺人工具”(John 8:44; Rom 1:18-32; Rev 20:7-10),都是“撒旦的苗裔”(Gen 3:15; Rev 21:8),都是自編自導自演“中國奴人與殺人文化劇”的參與者。

Ps 2,“Arthur Henderson Smith”在《Chinese Characteristics》(1890版)書裡的結論說: In order to reform China, the springs of character must be reached, and purified, conscience must be practically enthroned, and no longer imprisoned in its own palace, like the long line of Japanese Mikados. It is a truth well stated by one of the leading exponents of modern philosophy, that “there is no alchemy by which to get golden conduct from leader instincts”. What China needs is righteousness, and in order to attain it, it is absolutely necessary that she have a clear perception, and a deep conviction that there is a “Power that makes for righteousness.” The perception of such a power, gives a meaning to History, other than that of a blind evolution of unknown and unpreventable causes. Marcus Aurelius expressed the feeling of the best part of Paganism, when he said in substance, “things are repeated over and over from eternity,” “whatever happens, or is to happen, has in fact already been. It is only the same show repeated.” But the thought of progress, toward an end divinely contemplated, by agencies of new and transcendent effectiveness, that was common to Christians and “it formed the contrast,” as Neander has said, “between the Christian view of life, and the Pagan notion of a circle aimlessly repeating itself by a blind law of necessity.” “Christianity to-day, to a greater exent than ever before, is the moulding force of civilization…. It has passed in fact, into the thought and life of the world; and all recent enterprize among the nations of Christendom, for physical advance, for legal reform, for just amendment of political conditions, takes impulse and courage from this hope of the future. The age is one “impatient of Isthmuses”. It is equally impatient of mountain barriers, or of the obstacles to human intercourse interposed by winds and waves on the sea, by streams of desert-tracts on the land. And behind every drill which cuts the rock in the mountain tunnel, behind every engine which drives the ship against storm and tempest over the riotous fury of waves, or which propels the loaded train over alkali plains and rocky crests, is this invisible force of the spirit which since the new religion came, has expected a future to be wrought our by it, conformable to it, its ultimate crown of earthly glory.” The manifold needs of China, we find then to be a single imperative need. It will be met permanently, completely, only, by Christian Civilization.