在漢文化的鳥籠裡，大一統鳥對螢火蟲說，“為什麼‘中華民國政權’與‘中華人民共和國政權’，不允許東亞大陸各省、區、縣、市長實行獨立的普選？”螢火蟲提出了意見，“所謂的‘中華’與‘中國’，就是‘漢人大一統’，就是‘漢人專制’，就是‘漢人中央集權’，就是‘漢人統治各族’，因此‘中華民國(1912年)、中華蘇維埃共和國(1931年)、中華人民共和國(1949年)、中華聯邦、中國聯邦、中華聯邦自治國、中華聯邦共和國、中國聯邦共和國、大中華聯邦、大中華聯邦共和國、中華民主共和國聯邦、大中國邦聯、大中華邦聯、新的聯邦中國、新的中國邦聯、中國國聯、中華國聯、中華自治共和國、中華民主共和國’等，不就是‘中華帝國’？”
“所謂的‘中華帝國’，不就是‘漢人畫地自限的帝國’？不就是‘小漢人帝國’？不就是‘裹小腳的帝國’？不就是‘小鼻子小眼睛的帝國’？不就是‘漢人拒絕接受亞洲的小圈圈國’？不就是‘漢人拒絕與亞洲合併而為一的小圈圈國’？”
“所謂的‘中華帝國’，怎麼可能允許《美國獨立宣言》的理念？怎麼可能允許《美國獨立宣言》裡的‘An individual person, An independent person, An independent state, Constitutional federal republic(The United States of America)’理念？怎麼可能允許《美國獨立宣言》裡的‘住民自決、住民自治與住民立憲’理念？怎麼可能允許東亞大陸各省、區、縣、市制定類似《美國獨立宣言》的《獨立宣言》？怎麼可能允許東亞大陸各省、區、縣、市長等實行獨立的普選？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能擺脫‘中華’、‘中國’、‘漢人大一統’、‘漢人專制’、‘漢人中央集權’、‘漢人統治各族’的問題，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受《美國獨立宣言》的理念，才有可能接受《美國獨立宣言》裡的‘An individual person, An independent person, An independent state, Constitutional federal republic(The United States of America)’理念，才有可能接受《美國獨立宣言》裡的‘住民自決、住民自治與住民立憲’理念，才有可能接受東亞大陸各省、區、縣、市制定類似《美國獨立宣言》的《獨立宣言》，才有可能接受東亞大陸各省、區、縣、市長等實行獨立的普選，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受‘Individualism, Liberalism, Individual rights and individual freedom, Freeman, Spirit of Liberty, Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law, Tripartite Separation of Powers (Separation of executive, legislative, and judicial powers)’等理念，才有可能接受‘Fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights’理念，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受‘All power from the people, Limited Government(Limited power of the government), People have the right to choose their government, All peoples have the right of self-determination, People have the right to protect their fundamental and inalienable self-government, People have the right to establish a nation, People have the right to autonomy, People have the right to establish a Constitution, Citizens are not subordinate to the government, Human rights transcend sovereignty’等理念，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受《美國獨立宣言》裡的‘All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that they are among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’理念，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受‘California Republic, Republic of Hawaii, Republic of Texas, Colorado Republic, North Carolina Republic, Arizona Republic, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Commonwealth of Virginia”等獨立國的理念，才有可能接受‘Republic of Taiwan, Republic of Tibet, Republic of East Turkestan, Republic of Southern Mongolian, Republic of Sahaliyan ula, Republic of Qinghai, Republic of Hunan, Republic of Hubei, Republic of Jinsha, Republic of Chialing, Republic of Hong Kong, Republic of Macao, Republic of Hainan’(具體名稱應由住民自決)等獨立國的理念，不是嗎？”
“只有‘亞洲合眾國’才有可能接受‘All different Asian Independent States and the United States of Asia’的同時存在，才有可能接受‘The English language shall be the official language of all different Asian Independent States and the United States of Asia’，才有可能使‘The United States of Asia(commonly referred to as the United States, the U.S., the USA, or Asia)’成為第二個‘The United States of America(commonly referred to as the United States, the U.S., the USA, or America)’，不是嗎？”
2009-8-5（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）
